New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

A New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording november

In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that will allow several casino that is new become built through the state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is successful, that referendum shall be halted due to language within the ballot question that he claims violates state law.

Referendum Language Questioned

The language in the referendum includes a quantity of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in a light that is unmistakably positive. For example, the question mentions ‘promoting task growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting local governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was approved by hawaii Board of Elections in July.

But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. In accordance with a lawsuit filed into the ny State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the utilization of general public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’

‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use money that is public sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.

Snyder isn’t the one that is only has brought up problems with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also view it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider social ills that could come along with the advertised advantages of casino expansion. (daha&helliip;)