Glucose industry secretly covered favorable Harvard research

Dr. Cristin Kearns discovered documents showing that the sugar industry funded seminal research downplaying the part of sugar in cardiovascular disease. Elizabeth D. Herman for STAT

A s nutrition debates raged into the 1960s, prominent Harvard nutritionists posted two reviews in a premier medical journal downplaying the part of sugar in cardiovascular illness. Newly unearthed papers expose whatever they didn’t say: A sugar industry trade team initiated and paid for the studies, analyzed drafts, and presented a definite goal to guard sugar’s reputation into the eye that is public.

That revelation, posted Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, arises from Dr. Cristin Kearns during the University of Ca, san francisco bay area, a dentist-turned-researcher whom discovered the sugar industry’s fingerprints while searching through containers of letters into the basement of the Harvard library.

Her paper recounts how two famous Harvard nutritionists, Dr. Fredrick Stare and Mark Hegsted, who’re now deceased, worked closely with a trade team called the glucose analysis Foundation, that has been attempting to influence general public comprehension of sugar’s part in illness.

The trade team solicited Hegsted, a teacher of nourishment at Harvard’s general general public health college, to create a literary works review targeted at countering very very early research connecting sucrose to heart disease that is coronary. (daha&helliip;)